To provide for the transfer of administrative jurisdiction over certain Federal land in the State of California, and for other purposes.
Latest action (14 Sep 2026): On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
What this bill does
H.R. 8454 would swap administrative jurisdiction over two adjacent parcels of federal land in Tuolumne County, California, near Yosemite National Park. About 160 acres currently managed as part of the Stanislaus National Forest (under the Secretary of Agriculture) would be transferred to the Secretary of the Interior to be managed as part of Yosemite National Park. In exchange, about 170 acres currently within Yosemite National Park (under the Secretary of the Interior) would be transferred to the Secretary of Agriculture to be managed as part of Stanislaus National Forest. The bill also allows the two agencies to make minor boundary or survey corrections by mutual agreement, effective once published in the Federal Register, and it preserves existing valid rights, leases, permits, and other authorizations on the affected land, with the new managing agency responsible for administering them going forward.
The bill mainly affects federal land management in this specific area of California, aligning agency jurisdiction with actual land use patterns around the Ackerson Meadow area. It does not change land ownership—the land remains federal—only which agency (Forest Service or National Park Service) administers it. There is no indication of broader impact on the public beyond visitors, permit holders, or others whose activities are governed by whichever agency manages the land.
The bill was introduced by Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA) in April 2026 and passed the House by voice vote on September 14, 2026, under a procedure used for noncontroversial measures. It now goes to the Senate, which would need to pass it—potentially with amendments—before it could be sent to the President for signature into law.
Plain-English summary generated by Bill100 AI from the official record. Always verify against the source below.
Official summary
This bill exchanges administrative jurisdiction over specified parcels of federal land between Yosemite National Park and Stanislaus National Forest in California.
By way of background, cattle are grazing on the land currently managed by the National Park Service. However, grazing on federal lands primarily occurs on lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management or the Forest Service. The transfer would allow the land with cattle grazing to be managed by the Forest Service, which has a multiple-use management plan that is consistent with grazing.
Timeline
14 Sep 2026
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.
22 Jul 2026
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.
Common questions
- What does H.R. 8454 do?
- H.R. 8454 would swap administrative jurisdiction over two adjacent parcels of federal land in Tuolumne County, California, near Yosemite National Park. About 160 acres currently managed as part of the Stanislaus National Forest (under the Secretary of Agriculture) would be transferred to the Secretary of the Interior to be managed as part of Yosemite National Park. In exchange, about 170 acres currently within Yosemite National Park (under the Secretary of the Interior) would be transferred to the Secretary of Agriculture to be managed as part of Stanislaus National Forest. The bill also allows the two agencies to make minor boundary or survey corrections by mutual agreement, effective once published in the Federal Register, and it preserves existing valid rights, leases, permits, and other authorizations on the affected land, with the new managing agency responsible for administering them going forward. The bill mainly affects federal land management in this specific area of California, aligning agency jurisdiction with actual land use patterns around the Ackerson Meadow area. It does not change land ownership—the land remains federal—only which agency (Forest Service or National Park Service) administers it. There is no indication of broader impact on the public beyond visitors, permit holders, or others whose activities are governed by whichever agency manages the land. The bill was introduced by Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA) in April 2026 and passed the House by voice vote on September 14, 2026, under a procedure used for noncontroversial measures. It now goes to the Senate, which would need to pass it—potentially with amendments—before it could be sent to the President for signature into law.
- Has H.R. 8454 become law?
- Not yet. As of 14 Sep 2026, H.R. 8454 is passed house (senate next).
- Who sponsored H.R. 8454?
- H.R. 8454 was sponsored by Rep. Tom McClintock [R-CA5] (Republican-CA), with 0 cosponsors.
- What's the latest action on H.R. 8454?
- On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (14 Sep 2026).
Related bills in Public Lands and Natural Resources
Illegal Red Snapper and Tuna Enforcement Act
A bill to redesignate a playground in the New River Gorge National Park and Preserve in the State of West Virginia as the “Hearts of Gold Playground: In Honor of West Virginia Children and Families Impacted by Childhood Cancer”.
Reversionary Interest Conveyance Act
Vicksburg National Military Park Boundary Modification Act
Bill100 mirrors the public U.S. legislative record from Congress.gov and GovTrack and adds plain-English AI summaries. It is an information tool, not legal, compliance or lobbying advice, and it is not affiliated with the U.S. Congress or any government agency. AI summaries can simplify or omit detail — every bill links to the official source; verify there before you rely on it.