A bill to place restrictions on searches and seizures of electronic devices at the border.
Latest action (24 Oct 2019): Introduced
What this bill does
Generate a neutral, plain-English explanation of what this bill does, who it affects and what happens next — grounded in the official text.
Official summary
This bill places restrictions on the search and seizure of electronic devices at the international border.
A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official may conduct a manual search of a device transported by an individual at the border only if the official has a reasonable suspicion that (1) the individual is transporting goods or persons in violation of the law or is not entitled to enter the country, and (2) the device contains information relevant to the suspected violation. A DHS official may seize a device only if the official has probable cause to believe that such conditions are satisfied, or that the individual is in violation of a law punishable by more than one year and the device has information about that violation.
A manual search is one that (1) is conducted without using another electronic device, software, a password, or biometric identifier to access protected data; (2) is in the presence of the individual; and (3) does not exceed four hours. For seized devices, DHS (1) shall obtain a warrant or court order within 48 hours or return the device, and (2) may not access the device before obtaining the warrant or court order.
A forensic search is one that falls outside the definition of a manual search (e.g. one where software is used) and may not be conducted without a warrant or court order.
The bill imposes various record keeping, information retention, and reporting requirements related to the search and seizure of devices at the border.
Common questions
- What does S. 2694 do?
- This bill places restrictions on the search and seizure of electronic devices at the international border. A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official may conduct a manual search of a device transported by an individual at the border only if the official has a reasonable suspicion that (1) the individual is transporting goods or persons in violation of the law or is not entitled to enter the country, and (2) the device contains information relevant to the suspected violation. A DHS official may seize a device only if the official has probable cause to believe that such conditions are satisfied, or that the individual is in violation of a law punishable by more than one year and the device has information about that violation. A manual search is one that (1) is conducted without using another electronic device, software, a password, or biometric identifier to access protected data; (2) is in the presence of the individual; and (3) does not exceed four hours. For seized devices, DHS (1) shall obtain a warrant or court order within 48 hours or return the device, and (2) may not access the device before obtaining the warrant or court order. A forensic search is one that falls outside the definition of a manual search (e.g. one where software is used) and may not be conducted without a warrant or court order. The bill imposes various record keeping, information retention, and reporting requirements related to the search and seizure of devices at the border.
- Has S. 2694 become law?
- Not yet. As of 24 Oct 2019, S. 2694 is introduced.
- Who sponsored S. 2694?
- S. 2694 was sponsored by Sen. Patrick Leahy [D-VT, 1975-2022] (Democrat-VT), with 1 cosponsor.
- What's the latest action on S. 2694?
- Introduced (24 Oct 2019).
Related bills in Immigration
To require the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to link together applications of family members throughout the NEXUS application process, and for other purposes.
Providing Emotional Assistance with Relief and Love Act
No Racketeers on our Shores Act
Northern Border Security Enhancement and Review Act
Bill100 mirrors the public U.S. legislative record from Congress.gov and GovTrack and adds plain-English AI summaries. It is an information tool, not legal, compliance or lobbying advice, and it is not affiliated with the U.S. Congress or any government agency. AI summaries can simplify or omit detail — every bill links to the official source; verify there before you rely on it.