Preserve our Salmon and Renewable Energy Resolution
The source supplies the latest action, but no lifecycle stage.
Latest action (16 Jul 2007): Referred to the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, and Oceans.
What this bill does
This resolution, H.Con.Res. 184, expresses the sense of Congress opposing the removal of dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers for the purpose of restoring fisheries. It supports the renewable energy produced by these dams and argues that their removal would not be environmentally or fiscally sound. The resolution states that existing studies have concluded against dam removal and that fish survivability rates have improved with the dams in place.
The bill affects communities in Oregon, Washington, and Idaho, as well as California, by addressing issues related to commerce, energy supply, and environmental impacts. It claims the dams are vital for transporting goods, supporting international trade, and providing affordable renewable energy. The resolution also suggests that removing the dams could negatively impact surrounding communities and agricultural land irrigation.
H.Con.Res. 184 was introduced in the House of Representatives in July 2007. It was then referred to the Committee on Natural Resources and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Subsequently, it was sent to the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, and Oceans for further consideration. As a concurrent resolution, it expresses the opinion of both the House and the Senate, but it does not have the force of law.
Plain-English summary generated by Bill100 AI from the official record. Always verify against the source below.
Timeline
16 Jul 2007
Referred to the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, and Oceans.
Common questions
- What does H.Con.Res. 184 do?
- This resolution, H.Con.Res. 184, expresses the sense of Congress opposing the removal of dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers for the purpose of restoring fisheries. It supports the renewable energy produced by these dams and argues that their removal would not be environmentally or fiscally sound. The resolution states that existing studies have concluded against dam removal and that fish survivability rates have improved with the dams in place. The bill affects communities in Oregon, Washington, and Idaho, as well as California, by addressing issues related to commerce, energy supply, and environmental impacts. It claims the dams are vital for transporting goods, supporting international trade, and providing affordable renewable energy. The resolution also suggests that removing the dams could negatively impact surrounding communities and agricultural land irrigation. H.Con.Res. 184 was introduced in the House of Representatives in July 2007. It was then referred to the Committee on Natural Resources and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Subsequently, it was sent to the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, and Oceans for further consideration. As a concurrent resolution, it expresses the opinion of both the House and the Senate, but it does not have the force of law.
- Has H.Con.Res. 184 become law?
- The source does not supply a confirmed lifecycle stage for H.Con.Res. 184. Check the latest action and official source below.
- Who sponsored H.Con.Res. 184?
- H.Con.Res. 184 was sponsored by Rep. Sali, Bill [R-ID-1] (R-ID), with 0 cosponsors.
- What's the latest action on H.Con.Res. 184?
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, and Oceans. (16 Jul 2007).
Related bills in Energy
License to Drill Act
Protecting Florida's Offshore Military Readiness Act
Clean School Bus Reauthorization Act
MORE American Fuel Act of 2026
Bill100 mirrors the public U.S. legislative record from Congress.gov and GovTrack and adds plain-English AI summaries. It is an information tool, not legal, compliance or lobbying advice, and it is not affiliated with the U.S. Congress or any government agency. AI summaries can simplify or omit detail — every bill links to the official source; verify there before you rely on it.